sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?
- From: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:21:50 +0000
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 01:30:39PM -0700, Andrew wrote:
> Can you describe what messages you think are too verbose or uninteresting?
> They may very well just be left over debug messages.
>
The various "nothing to do" lines and depends tracing messages... nice
for a higher setting of verbosity, but the basics should be a bit less
info for a user.
The problem is that most readers of this list are not just 'users' but
like to know what is going on as a developer does when tracing a cast.
If and when we ever hit 1.0 then you will see normal 'users' hit the
scene whom have no interest in dependency tracing.
> My usual mode of operation is to try and keep the user informed of whats
> going on. For example I added more messages to depends resolution because
> there can be huge pauses in certain cases and it can seem as if sorcery
> isnt doing anything.
>
We have nice spinners and progress bars for this as cleanse and --fix
show. That was always enough in the earlier days of sorcery.
> I agree that having an adjustable level of verbosity would be
> advantageous. Its a bit too late to do all that for 1.11 imo but
> hopefully we can get something in for 1.12.
>
Yes, this will be a rather broad change to implement.
Thanks,
erics
Attachment:
pgp0nCR2QLQ06.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Eric Schabell, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
John Harding, 09/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 09/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Eric Schabell, 09/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, evraire, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
John Harding, 09/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.