sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?
- From: "Jeremy A. Kolb" <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:41:33 -0400 (EDT)
I love the dependency messages, those are pretty useful and it's nice to
see what depends on what. The only bit that I believe is excessive is on
sorcery update when it shows every single file being installed. I don't
think that that is necessary.
Jeremy
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Andrew wrote:
> Can you describe what messages you think are too verbose or uninteresting?
> They may very well just be left over debug messages.
>
> My usual mode of operation is to try and keep the user informed of whats
> going on. For example I added more messages to depends resolution because
> there can be huge pauses in certain cases and it can seem as if sorcery
> isnt doing anything.
>
> I agree that having an adjustable level of verbosity would be
> advantageous. Its a bit too late to do all that for 1.11 imo but
> hopefully we can get something in for 1.12.
>
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 03:41:32PM +0200, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > Howdy all,
> >
> > I am not sure we as developers even notice, but it seems to me as a user
> > of devel/test sorcery that the verbosity is leaning a bit far on the
> > side of printing what should be debugging messages as standard user
> > output... maybe time for a look at what a user needs to see instead of
> > just printing out everything sorcery is doing?
> >
> > Used to be a clean and simple interface...
> >
> > PS. I dropped this on irc but think it should be sent out into the
> > community before stable sorcery is created from the current test.
> >
> > erics
> > --
> > Eric D. Schabell M.Sc. - Z-Rejected Guru
> > irc.freenode.net (#sourcemage), nick -> erics
> > http://www.sourcemage.org
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Eric Schabell, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
John Harding, 09/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 09/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Eric Schabell, 09/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, evraire, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
John Harding, 09/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.