sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: "Jeremy A. Kolb" <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- Cc: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:51:33 -0700
if voyeur is off, that part can be off too.
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 07:19:19PM -0400, Jeremy A. Kolb wrote:
> I'd take a vote or something, maybe other people like it? Maybe we can
> make it an option? I just think it's a little too long and outputting all
> of that to the screen takes time.
>
> Jeremy
>
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Andrew wrote:
>
> > I always figured it was similar to when you cast something you get all
> > the output. But fair enough, it can be supressed.
> >
> > -Andrew
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:41:33PM -0400, Jeremy A. Kolb wrote:
> > > I love the dependency messages, those are pretty useful and it's nice
> > > to
> > > see what depends on what. The only bit that I believe is excessive is
> > > on
> > > sorcery update when it shows every single file being installed. I
> > > don't
> > > think that that is necessary.
> > >
> > > Jeremy
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id EF10E21A = 36AD 8A92 8499 8439 E6A8 3724 D437 AF5D EF10 E21A
http://smgl.positivism.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF10E21A
Security Team Leader Source Mage GNU/Linux http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgprQeu_VbGaC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Eric Schabell, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
John Harding, 09/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 09/06/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Seth Alan Woolley, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Andrew, 09/07/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, Eric Schabell, 09/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 09/07/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?, evraire, 09/06/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery message verbosity getting out of hand?,
John Harding, 09/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.