sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 08:21:31 -0700
Quoting Hamish Greig <hgreig-nospam AT bigpond.net.au>:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:32, Adam Clark wrote:
> > Howdy all,
> >
> > Does anybody know what the rationale was to make gettext a required
> > component of SMGL? Glibc certainly builds and installs fine without
> > it... some other spells need to have configure options passed along to
> > them to disable nls if gettext doesn't exist, but if I don't want nls
> > support on my system, why is SMGL forcing me to have it? For me, it
> > just wastes disk space and memory.
> >
> > Any chance we could make gettext optional?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Adam
>
> sounds like a good idea.
> WIth Andrew's great work on prometheus, removing gettext and finding out
> what
>
> needs nls disabled could now be done relatively easily.
> Maybe this could be a goal for the grimoire team's roadmap ?
I think it'd be great to get all of our dependencies correct (and thanks to
Prometheus we're much closer than we ever were. ;)) so that we can correctly
have only what we need installed, nothing more, for the initial install.
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Adam Clark, 04/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Hamish Greig, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Andrew, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional, Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Robert Helgesson, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional, Robert Helgesson, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Andrew, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Hamish Greig, 04/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.