sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 01:32:37 +0000
Howdy all,
Does anybody know what the rationale was to make gettext a required
component of SMGL? Glibc certainly builds and installs fine without
it... some other spells need to have configure options passed along to
them to disable nls if gettext doesn't exist, but if I don't want nls
support on my system, why is SMGL forcing me to have it? For me, it
just wastes disk space and memory.
Any chance we could make gettext optional?
Thanks,
-Adam
-
[SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Adam Clark, 04/04/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Hamish Greig, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Andrew, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional, Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Robert Helgesson, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional, Robert Helgesson, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Paul, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Andrew, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Eric Sandall, 04/08/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Making gettext optional,
Hamish Greig, 04/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.