sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:17:39 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 13:03, Casey Harkins wrote:
> > for efficient ISO/network installs the depends need to exist within the
> > cache tarball I think. recording data in a seperate file would work for a
> > running system, but for installing, the cache tarball should be a
> > standalone package relying on no external files. (like nearly all the
> > other package managers do)
>
> Right, but the depends file would be in the cache. It would be created
> upon casting in /var/state/sorcery/depends/$spell. This file would be
> tracked by sorcery (just like the install, md5, compile logs) and
> therefore be in the cache tarball.
>
> To resurrect, this file could be extracted individually and examined to
> determine dependencies. I think this would be just as effective as the
> first method.
>
> -casey
Aaaahh!
Now I see exactly what you meant.
You are a smart cookie.
(you can be some other food if you want)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAYkFD8fSufZR6424RArmUAJ42TFGTLtNsT2dz/ISrbP11Ie3+FgCggT69
zDgy+rLPNCLr+dJEjiq0yYc=
=zjgc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Eric Sandall, 03/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Hamish Greig, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Arwed von Merkatz, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Eric Sandall, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Andrew, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Andrew, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Casey Harkins, 03/25/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Hamish Greig, 03/25/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Casey Harkins, 03/25/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Andrew, 03/25/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Eric Sandall, 03/24/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, evraire, 03/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.