sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess
- From: evraire AT tuwg.com
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: RE: Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess
- Date: 24 Mar 2004 20:42:27 -0000
> more work, sorcery shouldn't record those changes in
> /var/state/sorcery/depends unless the user says yes when asked if he
> really wants to cast the spells.
What happens if the user isn't aware that Spell B required Spell A to be
recompiled with a different optional depends, or forgot about it. I know I
would be likely to forget about it if I originally said no to it. Now let's
say a new version of spell A is out, so I cast it... when it optionally asks
me for that particular depends, you're saying it would default to my "no"?
If I don't remember that spell B requires this dependency, won't I break
spell B by saying "no" again?
I think that it /should/ modify the depends, or at least the user should be
alerted that some other currently intalled spell presently depends on this
option being set. And what if I do unattended upgrades? I seem to recall
that being one of the goals for the stable grimoire... in that case, the
optional depends definitely needs to default to "yes".
Just a thought!
Jonathan Evraire
evraire at tuwg.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
Message sent via http://toad-mail.net
Anti-spam notice, this message originated from IP Address: 69.70.196.119
-------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Andrew, 03/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Casey Harkins, 03/25/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Hamish Greig, 03/25/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Casey Harkins, 03/25/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess, Andrew, 03/25/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Casey Harkins, 03/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Optional dependencies and dependency mess,
Hamish Greig, 03/24/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.