Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Cc: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>, sm-sorcery AT lists.ibiblio.org, sm-grimoire AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?
  • Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:03:22 +1100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:28, Eric Schabell wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:23:47PM +1100, Hamish Greig wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:25, Eric Schabell wrote:
> > > Howdy all,
> > >
> > > We have a possible new Sorcery Leader in the form of a well known and
> > > experienced Smgl'er:
> > >
> > > Andrew Stitt (a.k.a. afraydknot)
> > >
> > > If there are others, I would like to start a discussion with responses
> > > from the Sorcery Developers (see org chart) only as to the possible
> > > other candidates, votes for / against this one, or thoughts on the
> > > subject.
> > >
> > > I would like to get this done as soon as possible, so let youself be
> > > heard. I will count the incomming votes and let you all know asap the
> > > final outcome. Please post all replys here if you would.
> >
> > Having waited a week for any response, but seen none, I have to say what
> > a load of horsecrap this is.
> > This is not an internal issue for the sorcery team to discuss, it is for
> > the project to discuss. All the grimoire gurus, all the sorcery team, all
> > the iso/cauldron team, even all the users if they wish to be involved. It
> > is not just about who wants to lead a team of developers, it is about
> > their skill set, the standard of their work, their communication skills,
> > their availability and their approachability. Anything less than full
> > open discussion of applications to help steer this project is a farce.
> >
> > As a previously active guru...
>
> As a departing memeber of this project, your vote does not weigh to
> heavy...
>
> erics
>

Eric, as always, thank you for your valuable feedback.
You comments are helpful, insightful, well-presented and logical.
Your step by step addressing of individual points in any argument, your
ability to recognise crucial issues and begin dealing with them before they
have any negative impact, your natural perceptiveness, awareness of
developers rights, respect for developers opinions, you ability to
objectively arbitrate disputes, to broker a compromise when possible and your
open,public communication style have long been assets to this project.
I shudder to think where this project would be if you hadn't been available
to
represent our wishes and coordinate with the individual teams in the lead up
to this major 1.0 release.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAVlJa8fSufZR6424RAjNFAJkBMs9OAtSjkrSl4BbY7pZJadjSowCgjWbI
rErO5wk3tGtp7FEaBI0Hp7M=
=Pewf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page