sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?
- From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:58:57 +1100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 14:03, David Kowis wrote:
> All right, Obviously theres some bad blood here, and I don't know all of
> it. I do know that sometimes Hamish, you come off kinda haughty. Of course,
> everyones opinion should weigh equally, because if someone new shows up
> that has had nothing to do with Source Mage, says one thing, and then
> leaves, it might be one of the most important things ever. I think it would
> be best to let bygons be bygons. Theres no reason to continue flaming on
> the lists. My main focus is on making Source Mage a better distributon.
> That's where it should stay.
>
> My $0.02
> David Kowis
I have spent some time recently summarising what I see as problems, trying
hard to use specific examples without specific names, offering alternatives
when I could, calling for public discussion of items when I couldn't.
Correct me if I am wrong, but in general no-one has told me I have been
wrong,
that the problems don't exist. Instead the emails arguing against my claims
have called me a little general, said I whine like a girl, that my opinion
doesn't count, that I always have to have the last say and that I come off
haughty. Should I consider this constructive discussion in any way ?
So here is my final comment .
After finishing what the previous ISO/cauldron team had planned, but didn't
achieve, I will cease contributing to the project. I will have achieved what
was planned for the last year and then the work in the grimoire (and sorcery)
will be complemented by the new ISO. I have already worked to hard to want to
walk away before this goal is achieved.
Until I finish these features for the ISO or until the project asks me to
step
down and stop contributing, I will continue to wave a red flag everytime i
see a problem, you can ignore me or discuss the points I bring up as you see
fit.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAV7708fSufZR6424RAksyAJ4jE7HIcs3vy36OelJydYZcanTzaQCeLXcE
Qy3FZDJmbdEKnMnxlXeP0cA=
=QHFo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Schabell, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Schabell, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Schabell, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Andrew, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Grimoire] Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Hamish Greig, 03/15/2004
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
David Kowis, 03/15/2004
- RE: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Eric Sandall, 03/16/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Hamish Greig, 03/16/2004
-
RE: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
David Kowis, 03/15/2004
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Re: [SM-Sorcery] Sorcery Lead change nomination(s)?,
Eric Sandall, 03/15/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.