sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
- Cc: Robert Helgesson <rycee AT home.se>, sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 17:59:20 -0500
No, Python is soo amaturish. We should use Java and change the
simpleinit scripts to XML.
afrayednot's stuff requires a FS. I'm not sure if it actualy writes to
the file, but the file must exist.
Could we use the clock memory?
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 16:20, Seth Woolley wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'd rather fork off a daemon and do ipc to it... maybe use afrayednot's
> ipc tools if not bash...
>
> or we could do it all in python ;)
>
> There's also nvram we could use :)
>
> Seth
>
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Paul Mahon wrote:
>
> > You're right, it's not required for anything. henh, you could mount the
> > swap partition as ext2 until there's a real FS... ;)
> >
> > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 03:22, Robert Helgesson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:23:34 -0500, Paul Mahon wrote:
> > > > I don't suppse it would be possible to mount a tmpfs system right at
> > > > the
> > > > start?
> > >
> > > Yes, that would probably work, but I'm not sure that it's safe to assume
> > > tmpfs being available on all smgl installations. Is tmpfs required by
> > > anything else?
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 00:25, Robert Helgesson wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 23:41:53 -0500, Paul Mahon wrote:
> > > > > > I don't know how the init stuff actualy works, so the no FS
> > > > > > limitation
> > > > > > may not be as bad. Good ideas though.
> > > > >
> > > > > It is as bad as you can imagine and worse. Being limited to no
> > > > > read/write fs access and no /usr can be quite frustrating at times
> > > > > :)
> > --
> > De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
> >
> > What is that funny looking stuff in the attachment?
> > http://www.technomom.com/cynthia/pgp/
> >
>
> - --
> Seth Alan Woolley <seth at tautology.org>, SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
> Key id 7BEACC7D = 2978 0BD1 BA48 B671 C1EB 93F7 EDF4 3CDF 7BEA CC7D
> Full Key at seth.tautology.org and pgp.mit.edu. info: www.gnupg.org
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
>
> iD8DBQE/hdEx7fQ833vqzH0RApU7AJ457uQtnkLbUEmDssyXgywRnvcaeQCfThhD
> PJMiIKnfD5Gu7sha4y7RqcY=
> =ACup
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
What is that funny looking stuff in the attachment?
http://www.technomom.com/cynthia/pgp/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] init woes,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Seth Woolley, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Damien Mascord, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Tony Smith, 10/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Tony Smith, 10/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/08/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Tony Smith, 10/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Damien Mascord, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Seth Woolley, 10/08/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.