sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul Mahon <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Robert Helgesson <rycee AT home.se>
- Cc: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 12:03:59 -0500
You're right, it's not required for anything. henh, you could mount the
swap partition as ext2 until there's a real FS... ;)
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 03:22, Robert Helgesson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 02:23:34 -0500, Paul Mahon wrote:
> > I don't suppse it would be possible to mount a tmpfs system right at the
> > start?
>
> Yes, that would probably work, but I'm not sure that it's safe to assume
> tmpfs being available on all smgl installations. Is tmpfs required by
> anything else?
>
> > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 00:25, Robert Helgesson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 23:41:53 -0500, Paul Mahon wrote:
> > > > I don't know how the init stuff actualy works, so the no FS limitation
> > > > may not be as bad. Good ideas though.
> > >
> > > It is as bad as you can imagine and worse. Being limited to no
> > > read/write fs access and no /usr can be quite frustrating at times :)
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
What is that funny looking stuff in the attachment?
http://www.technomom.com/cynthia/pgp/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
[SM-Discuss] init woes,
Jeremy Kolb, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Seth Woolley, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Damien Mascord, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/09/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Robert Helgesson, 10/09/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Tony Smith, 10/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Seth Woolley, 10/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes, Tony Smith, 10/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Paul Mahon, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Damien Mascord, 10/08/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] init woes,
Seth Woolley, 10/08/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.