Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] p4 / cvs / alternate servers

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] p4 / cvs / alternate servers
  • Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 13:15:57 +1000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:26, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Just wrote some stuff in another mail about arch and subversion. Just
> looked at the meta-cvs website, it looks interesting.
> bitkeeper is out of the question. There's no need to replace one
> proprietary solution with another, since perforce does its job very good
> (when the server works, hope that Tony gets it stable again)
the same problem would potentially exist with whatever solution we use IF
there is no backup server.
Is it possible to have a second "slave" p4 server ? Is this allowed by the
license we have ?
Can we get a fallback server for cvs too ? Will our current cvs hosts
continue
to help out if we request to use a different tool ?
Also I just want to remind everyone that according to the recent mails it is
apparently vital that we make some progress in terms of returning "devel"
access to the users.
Hamish
IRC nick: drmoriarty
One of three conspirators in the SMGL hijacking.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Yovt8fSufZR6424RAgxiAJ4zhQ0LhFtLdqm+cVSDo127eDuoewCeLoDA
fuetNzuw79J9MMQyJNuxIu4=
=Evrp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page