Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:26, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> Just wrote some stuff in another mail about arch and subversion. Just
> looked at the meta-cvs website, it looks interesting.
> bitkeeper is out of the question. There's no need to replace one
> proprietary solution with another, since perforce does its job very good
> (when the server works, hope that Tony gets it stable again)
the same problem would potentially exist with whatever solution we use IF 
there is no backup server.
Is it possible to have a second "slave" p4 server ? Is this allowed by the 
license we have ?
Can we get a fallback server for cvs too ? Will our current cvs hosts 
continue 
to help out if we request to use a different tool ?
Also I just want to remind everyone that according to the recent mails it is 
apparently vital that we make some progress in terms of returning "devel" 
access to the users.
Hamish 
IRC nick: drmoriarty
One of three conspirators in the SMGL hijacking.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Yovt8fSufZR6424RAgxiAJ4zhQ0LhFtLdqm+cVSDo127eDuoewCeLoDA
fuetNzuw79J9MMQyJNuxIu4=
=Evrp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----