sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Doubletwist said:
> Actually this may be a Bad Idea(tm)...
> While for YEARS I had no problem using lilo on the MBR, that all changed
> with WinXP.
> If I have WinXP and the install linux and use lilo in the MBR, it hoses
> my WinXP partition.
>
> It may have something to do with the way WinXP partitions the disk. I
> remember reading somewhere about the fact that when DOS partitioned the
> disk, it didn't start on the first sector. It left the first cylinder
> empty. In addition to the MBR, things like Lilo use that first cyl. Some
> non-MS OSes may not leave that cyl open, and it's possible [not sure
> though] that with XP, windows has started to use that as well.
> [Possibly on purpose, who knows].
>
> Anyway, I think the best option would be for a menu item to choose if
> the user wants it installed in the MBR or on a bootable linux partition,
> with good descriptions of the pro's and con's of each.
>
> DT
I've had no problems with LILO+WinXP on my laptop (Dell), and on my main
(a.k.a. gaming) machine, GRUB+WinXP works fine as well. However, a friend
of mine couldn't get either LILO _or_ GRUB to work on his laptop (Compaq),
not sure if it had something to do with WinXP or not, but we're going to
try again this semester.
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5A317214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Adam Clark, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
John T Copeland, 01/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Jason Flatt, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Adam Clark, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Adam Clark, 01/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Geoffrey Derber, 01/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Jeremy A. Kolb, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Adam Clark, 01/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, John T Copeland, 01/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Geoffrey Derber, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
John T Copeland, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Doubletwist, 01/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Doubletwist, 01/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Eric Sandall, 01/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Dufflebunk, 01/16/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Wyatt Draggoo, 01/16/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Wyatt Draggoo, 01/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Geoffrey Derber, 01/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Wyatt Draggoo, 01/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Wyatt Draggoo, 01/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Adam Clark, 01/18/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Wyatt Draggoo, 01/17/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO, Geoffrey Derber, 01/17/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Updated ISO,
Adam Clark, 01/16/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.