sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 12:05:49 -0800 (PST)
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:44:11PM +0100, Julian v. Bock wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> >>>>> "ES" == Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> writes:
>>
>> ES> Correct, this is a "problem" with the new ncurses (5.3) spell, or
>> ES> rather, the new spell provides the proper ncurses.h, but gcc also
>> ES> provides it's own ncurses.h, which does not allow some programs to
>> ES> compile against it, so you need to remove the gcc supplied
>> ES> ncurses.h as Joel says above. (Did I get the logic right?)
>>
>> Almost ;)
>>
>> gcc does not come with its own ncurses.h, but it creates its own
>> version at compile time. If ncurses is updated afterwards the gcc
>> version causes conflicts since it is not updated.
>
> It does the same thing with slang.h, which can break slrn. Are these
> file required for anything or can they be safely deleted?
Perhaps we should have slang and ncurses remove their older, incompatable
gcc versions when they're installed? They should also update the install
log for the respective spells, otherwise a 'cast --fix' will put them
back, or is this what we want?
Any other spells that do this?
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5A317214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
John T Copeland, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 12/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Dufflebunk, 12/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Michael Denio, 12/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Julian v. Bock, 12/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Michael Denio, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
bluebird, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Eric Sandall, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Julian v. Bock, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
bluebird, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Eric Sandall, 12/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Dufflebunk, 12/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Eric Sandall, 12/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, bluebird, 12/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Dufflebunk, 12/07/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Casey Harkins, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, bluebird, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Casey Harkins, 12/11/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Eric Schabell, 12/11/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Eric Sandall, 12/07/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
bluebird, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Julian v. Bock, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Eric Sandall, 12/06/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
bluebird, 12/06/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?, Julian v. Bock, 12/08/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 12/06/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.