Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: bluebird AT optushome.com.au
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] xfree86 spell problem?
  • Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 09:35:47 +1100

On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 10:44:11PM +0100, Julian v. Bock wrote:
> Hi
>
> >>>>> "ES" == Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> writes:
>
> ES> Correct, this is a "problem" with the new ncurses (5.3) spell, or
> ES> rather, the new spell provides the proper ncurses.h, but gcc also
> ES> provides it's own ncurses.h, which does not allow some programs to
> ES> compile against it, so you need to remove the gcc supplied
> ES> ncurses.h as Joel says above. (Did I get the logic right?)
>
> Almost ;)
>
> gcc does not come with its own ncurses.h, but it creates its own
> version at compile time. If ncurses is updated afterwards the gcc
> version causes conflicts since it is not updated.

It does the same thing with slang.h, which can break slrn. Are these
file required for anything or can they be safely deleted?

--
begin signature.vbs
Joel Mayes | Sourcemage GNU/Linux
jmayes at sourcemage.org | http://sourcemage.org/
Musician and Music Teacher | x11 & doc Grimoire Guru




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page