Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
  • To: Ryan Abrams <rabrams AT sourcemage.org>
  • Cc: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>, SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems
  • Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 18:19:46 -0700

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 04:22:43PM -0500, Ryan Abrams wrote:
> Hmm.. could we take a dual approach? a "sorcery" spell which does nothing
> but list depends and stay sustained, and an "update_sorcery" function in
> sorcery itself? As far as gaze version and such, you are write. But users
> could jsut run sorcery and look. Not /as/ nice, but its there.

Well, possibly. However the more I think about it, the more I agree
that sorcery probably would do best *not* being a spell. However
we really need to think about how things should behave in this
respect.

> I dont know. It just seems like using sorcery routines to update sorcery
> routines is inherently unstable, because at some point in the process, the
> system is hosed on the disk, and sorcery only exists in memory. and that
> leads to crap like power outages hosing systems... or 1 bug in a spell
> leaving a system hosed.. etc.

I agree completely.

- Nick




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page