sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Seth Woolley <seth AT tautology.org>
- To: SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems
- Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Doesn't it already do that?
You have to run /tmp/sorcery.restore or something like that if things go
wrong.
Instead........
I think what needs to happen is it should not delete anything at all (at
first). Check against the old install log. Copy files over the top of
other files, delete files that were in the install log but aren't in the
new install log if reap is on. That way nothing gets deleted. Only
"updating" happens.
I suggest this should happen with all spells. The way it currently
happens is broke, broke, broke. Nobody's fault, really, but nevertheless,
broke.
Maybe this requires a last stage after casting to check for reap and then
reap what should be rept. Can't this just happen by moving reap until the
end and then doing a schnazzy diff or something like that? It would be a
real quick perl script (using hashes), but I think it would be about the
same size in bash or sh. I'd prefer a dependcy on diff just to be sure.
Let's stop torturing people by breaking their computers, ummkay?
Seth
> Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems
>
> Stand by as I make an ass of myself seeing as I don't know much about how
> sorcery works but, here goes...
>
> When updating sorcery, could we somehow make a local copy of sorcery and
> then run the copy, wipe out the original, download and install the new
> version (maybe verify it's integrity), then wipe out the old copy?
-
[SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Spencer Ogden, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Nick Jennings, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Ryan Abrams, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Nick Jennings, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Ryan Abrams, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Jonathan Evraire, 09/12/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems, Ryan Abrams, 09/12/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems, Seth Woolley, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Nick Jennings, 09/12/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems, Ryan Abrams, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Jonathan Evraire, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Ryan Abrams, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Nick Jennings, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Ryan Abrams, 09/12/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Still Problems,
Nick Jennings, 09/12/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.