sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?
- From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- To: Jon Svendsen <jon-sven AT frisurf.no>
- Cc: SMGL Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?
- Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 01:09:15 -0400
OK, no update. Let galeon float :-). Thank you!
Jon Svendsen wrote:
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 16:10, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
This is "kind of" opinion poll. Mozilla is now at 1.0 in the grimoire, but I'm working with 1.1b since it became available and it's a stable browser, mail, and IRC client. I can update the spell as a temporary section maintainer. This update will only happen after GCC 3.2 is introduced into the grimoire.
Opinions, please? Thank you!
This would break galeon and probably any other mozilla-dependant spell.
API stability is not one of mozilla's strong points.
So I vote no. ;) Keep in mind that mozilla is more than a "browser,
mail, and IRC client", it's a development platform for an
(theoretically, not practically at the moment) arbitrary number of
applications.
Jon
-
[SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/20/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?, Nick Jennings, 08/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Jon Svendsen, 08/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 08/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Joel Mayes, 08/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?, Jon Svendsen, 08/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Joel Mayes, 08/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 08/21/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.