Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jose Bernardo Silva <josebernardo1 AT yahoo.com>
  • To: SMGL Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?
  • Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 09:20:14 +0100 (BST)

I vote for a "mozilla-devel" spell which also provides
mozilla, as someone else proposed earlier (sorry,
can't remember who right now, haven't had yet my
morning coffee). Like that, anyone who wants to break
his system can do so...

--- Jon Svendsen <jon-sven AT frisurf.no> wrote: > On
Tue, 2002-08-20 at 16:10, Sergey A. Lipnevich
> wrote:
> > This is "kind of" opinion poll. Mozilla is now at
> 1.0 in the grimoire,
> > but I'm working with 1.1b since it became
> available and it's a stable
> > browser, mail, and IRC client. I can update the
> spell as a temporary
> > section maintainer. This update will only happen
> after GCC 3.2 is
> > introduced into the grimoire.
> > Opinions, please? Thank you!
>
> This would break galeon and probably any other
> mozilla-dependant spell.
> API stability is not one of mozilla's strong points.
>
> So I vote no. ;) Keep in mind that mozilla is more
> than a "browser,
> mail, and IRC client", it's a development platform
> for an
> (theoretically, not practically at the moment)
> arbitrary number of
> applications.
>
> Jon


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page