sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergeyli AT pisem.net>
- Cc: SMGL Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:58:59 -0700
Why not a mozilla-devel spell? It could always apply to the development
branch of mozilla (since there will most likely always be one). The
two would have to be mutualy exclusive (i.e. both provide 'mozilla').
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 10:10:12AM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> This is "kind of" opinion poll. Mozilla is now at 1.0 in the grimoire,
> but I'm working with 1.1b since it became available and it's a stable
> browser, mail, and IRC client. I can update the spell as a temporary
> section maintainer. This update will only happen after GCC 3.2 is
> introduced into the grimoire.
> Opinions, please? Thank you!
>
> --Sergey.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
-
[SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/20/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?, Nick Jennings, 08/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Jon Svendsen, 08/20/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 08/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Joel Mayes, 08/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?, Jon Svendsen, 08/21/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Joel Mayes, 08/21/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 08/22/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Should mozilla be updated to 1.1b?,
Jose Bernardo Silva, 08/21/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.