Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] changes at seed saver's exchange

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: mangodance <bmn@iglou.com>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] changes at seed saver's exchange
  • Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:56:53 -0500

How could 2/5 of the board effect this? The letter basically calls out the two though I am left failing to understand how it could happen if only two people were behind it. The corporate nature of the firing is telling. It will be interesting to see the IRS Form 990 for last year.

A meeting that suddenly suprises one with a labor attorney in attendance...sigh...

If you go to the SSE website there is a letter from the board. When nearly start a letter with "We cannot and will not comment on everything, as it would not be in the best interests of SSE to publicly reveal, discuss, or debate confidential internal personnel matters.", in my mind it is immediately suspect. I know this tactic is common, but so much for the light of day blazing out the shadows. And while the letter seeks to show them reaching out, it is only after statements like, "Kent’s letter, by its tone and content, demonstrates that his relationship with the Board had deteriorated beyond repair by the time of his departure."

Below that on the SSE page is a letter by Diana Ott Whealy. As one might expect, the letter goes a long way towards saying "nothing to see here", but lacks much in the way of substance other than to say "nuh-uh".

It isn't surprising to see the lack of content in letters such as these once attorneys get involved. One would just hope for more substance. These letters always raise more eyebrows and leave one with more questions than illumination. Pity.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page