Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] question for list members: is a formal netiquette guide for the PC list desired?

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Martin Naylor <martinwnaylor@yahoo.com.au>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] question for list members: is a formal netiquette guide for the PC list desired?
  • Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 18:47:15 +1100 (EST)

Hi
"We are forced to define our own meanings"
Who said so, thought is the only thing that could, and in most cases out of
fear of the unknown which is something that can never be known, things like
death

Humans have been doing this since they dropped out of the trees [well
thought has been playing these games]
through every tribe culture and religion including the present day
So what you have is thought which is entirely built on the past [memory]
creating the present and projecting into the future with total failure [well
it will be shortly for the vast majority]
If we could except thought as useful for work and communication and be in
the ever changing moment then we are at the beginning the journey and the end
simultaneously
and there is nothing stoping you until thought jumps back in to assert it's
dominance [observe your own thoughts as your reading and when you finish]
this is either true or false
I guess this is zone 0 [home] in permaculture terms
Martin

"Lawrence F. London, Jr." <lfl@intrex.net> wrote:

Is list consensus that a netiquette guide for the PC list
homepage should be created or is an anarcho-unregulated freethinking
eschatological* existential* mode preferred?

* http://www.arcosanti.org/theory/glossary/eschat.html
Paolo Soleri's Glossary of Terms
Eschatological Hypothesis
"An hypothesis framed in the propostion that a meaningful end is in the realm
of the possible and definitely in the
realm of the desirable. The hypothesis sees the resolution of the becoming
(of reality) into Omega Seed , that is, into
the reawakening of all the past in a state of total self revelation.
Since the truth is in the making (it is not a given) for the obvious reason
that reality itself is in the making and the
reality is the only arbiter, in fact the only "definer" of the truth (if it
is), the eschatological end is not
pre-defined, preordained, predestined, predesigned (all of those are from the
realm of mandate from above). Therefore
the hypothesis has no guarantee tags in the sense of what and why. The
grassroots procedure is the one that might
develop the Howness conducive to the slow emergence of the what and why, that
is, of what the desirable could be."

* http://www.tameri.com/csw/exist
"Existentialism attempts to describe our desire to make rational decisions
despite existing in an irrational universe.
Unfortunately, life might be without inherent meaning (existential atheists)
or it might be without a meaning we can
understand (existential theists). Either way, the human desires for logic and
immortality are futile. We are forced to
define our own meanings, knowing they might be temporary."




_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture



---------------------------------
On Yahoo!7
Messenger: Make free PC-to-PC calls to your friends overseas.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page