permaculture

[FranksFarm@aol.com]

In a message dated 9/28/02 9:24:04 PM, mmurphy@ctsl.com writes:

<< but we have

to show them that multicropping perennials and organic farming gives

them a higher net profit per acre over the life cycle of their farm than

what they are doing.  That includes methods of harvesting, on-farm

processing to capture more value and creating brand/label demand for

higher quality food. >>

Well said, Mr. Murphy. I sure do agree with the above sentiments.

<< Does anyone else think high brix = better food = better soils, and brix is 
the magic

number that can distinguish the organic farmers market produce from the

supermarket?  If we could charge more for high brix food because it

tastes better and is better for you, it would be easier to move

mainstream ag.>>

This whole subject is so complex that it cries out for some sort of widely 
accepted standard that is backed up by solid research. And it must be 
relatively easy to do effective low cost tests that can somehow be certified.

The more I read the more confusing it gets. If we start from the soil then 
almost all soils even those on organic farms are inherently differently due 
to types, region, and even micro climates. Then there are differences in soil 
life, fungi, etc., and often complex relationships with compost, fertilizers, 
rainfall, humidity, drought, symbiotic relationships and on and on.

It would be fantastic if we could actually agree and prove a quality system 
based upon sound science that rewards those who produce best tasting, 
nutrient rich, wholesome foods.  I also think that folks who use organic, PC, 
biodynamic methods are far more likely to do well in such a system.

 My gut feeling though is that such a system while theoretically of great 
benefit might prove to be a marketing nightmare!

Just my two cents:)  Frank