Percy-L: Literary, Religious, Scientific, and Philosophical Discussion of Walker Percy

["Parlin, Steven" <PARLINS AT culver.org>]

Touche'

But, then...neither would it be proper to impute to Walker an ex post facto tolerance of gay marriage...  (although, in so far as he gave ascent to the teachings of the RC Church, "grave immorality" is more likely the case).

 

Steve

 

btw: When in discussions, neither do I use expressions like "gravely immoral". Even though this is my conviction, people bristle, square off and eventually stop listening. One has to be more diplomatic and creative in their discourse... and though i fail miserably (i know i'm an ass), I try to take my cues from WP.

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Nikkibar AT aol.com [mailto:Nikkibar AT aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 9:39 AM
To: percy-l AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [percy-l] gay marriage

When I wrote (a message or two back) that Walker never got past the notion that homosexuals were disturbed, I think I did not make it clear that I never heard him use expressions like "gravely immoral." He did at one time thorw a guest out of his house for implying that William Alexander Percy (Uncle Will who raised Walker and his two brothers) was gay. So matters of gaiety and its morality were never discussed at least in my presence, although I did have occasion to chat with Walker over the issue of whether homosexiuality should continue to qualify as a mental disturbance in psychiatric or scientific context. He held that it did and I held that it didn't; we agreed to disagree, as we often did. I would suggest that perhaps one reason why he never voiced himself over the issue of the morality of the issue may have had something to do with the Uncle Will isue, a matter to which I was not sensitive at the time of any of our conversations. In short, I think he would have been unlikely to go that far, but chose to keep his opinions on the matter in the psychiatric context for reasons of his own which are nobody else's business. It would not be proper to impute to Walker an ex post facto endorsement of "grave immorality" on the basis of the intellectual fossil record.

Nikki Barranger