nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
- From: <reveland@bresnan.net>
- To: "North American Fruit Explorers" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate
- Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 13:57:57 -0700
I wonder what the tomatoes would have tasted like had they used ammonium nitrate to fertilize them. I say this with tongue in cheek because ammonium nitrate has both names in it's name. I have to assume that "ammonium" is ammonium hydroxide (a more dangerous, for the handler, and expensive chemical than ammonium nitrate), although it could possibly be urea as it is a commonly used fertilizer also. I have never purchased or ordered ammonium via mail order but I suppose it can be aquired that way, but when I oogle - ammonium mail order - I find lots of ammoniums that can be ordered mail order; Ammonium Lactate, Ammonium Molybdate, Ammonium Thiocyanate, Ammonium Carbonate, Ammonium Chloride, Glufosinate Ammonium, ammonium hydrogen hemihydrate, ammonia (ammonium hydroxide diluted in water), ammonium bicarbonate, ammonium nitrate, ammonium hydroxide, and more, but I really have no idea just which ammonium the Brits were using. Can I run down to the nearest nursery and order some ammonium? What chemical do you think those researchers were using?
Rodney Eveland
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Fruth" <jfruth@uslink.net>
Subject: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate
One hundred and forty one consumers can't be wrong. They rated tomatoes
grown with ammonium to be 59% higher in terms of taste and overall
acceptance compared to those grown with nitrate. Could this apply to fruit
trees too?
The message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
Shortcut to:
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/radio/reports/jan07r2.htm
_______________________________________________
nafex mailing list
nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on web sites.
Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have permission!
**YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
No exceptions.
----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be used to change other email options):
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex
File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
Please do not send binary files.
Use plain text ONLY in emails!
NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.10/625 - Release Date: 1/13/2007 5:40 PM
-
[NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
Jim Fruth, 01/14/2007
- Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate, reveland, 01/14/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
Lucky Pittman, 01/15/2007
- Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate, Thomas Olenio, 01/15/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate, Jim Fruth, 01/14/2007
-
[NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
Jim Fruth, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
reveland, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
O'Barr, R. D., 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
Stephen Sadler, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
reveland, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
Greg or Marie Jordan Tree Taxi, 01/16/2007
- Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate, Stephen Sadler, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
Greg or Marie Jordan Tree Taxi, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
reveland, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
Stephen Sadler, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
O'Barr, R. D., 01/16/2007
-
Re: [NAFEX] Ammonium vs. Nitrate,
reveland, 01/16/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.