livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
- From: moon@ceva.net
- To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [Livingontheland] Get on the Phone Now: SB-510
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:32:38 -0500
Conspiracies aside.this could be worse then NAIS.
Call your Senator Now.
An alert from our friendly nighborhood watchdog, (Joel Saliton etc.)VICFA:Virginia Independent Farmers and Consumers, similar asso's in many states now.
Alert Attached:
VICFA
April 14, 2010
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear VICFA Supporter,
We have received reports from Senate staffers that our call volume has been extremely
low. By all reports, S. 510 will be debated by the Senate within days. It is imperative
that we all call and make our voices heard. Do not assume that someone else is
going to call. Call now!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Call both of your Senators. You can find their contact information at www.senate.gov
[http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1103305814745&s=179&e=001GheUo8-JWVuLAx7T0SyGfe-SY1Z3bezUsNQ05e8pyUqBRvUjeBotm1I53Vz1S7Yy21ZMacrMZWNuL9Uxjsak2JHehRYVmTkJ8t9lANyh_is=],
or call the Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121 or toll-free at 877-210-5351. Ask
to speak with the staffer who handles food safety issues.
Tell the staffer that you want the Senator to amend S. 510. If you get their voice
mail instead of the staff, leave the following message:
"Hi, my name is _____ and I live in ______. I'm very concerned that S.510, the FDA
Food Safety Modernization Act, imposes unfair and burdensome regulations on local
food sources, which are very important to me. The Committee version of the bill
does not address my concerns, and I urge the Senator to support the Tester Amendment
to exclude small facilities and direct marketing farms from the most burdensome
provisions of the bill. Please call me back at ____________."
TALKING POINTS
1. The major foodborne illness outbreaks and recalls have all been caused by
the large, industrial food system. Small, local food producers have not contributed
to the highly publicized outbreaks. Yet S. 510 subjects the small, local food system
to the same, broad federal regulatory oversight that would apply to the industrial
food system.
2. Increased regulations and record-keeping obligations could destroy small
businesses that bring food to local communities. In particular, the reliance on
hazard analysis and risk-based preventative controls, a concept similar to "HACCP",
will harm small food producers. HACCP has already proven to be an overwhelming burden
for a significant number of small, regional meat processors across the country.
Applying a HACCP-type system to small, local foods processors could drive them out
of business, reducing consumers' options to buy fresh, local foods.
3. FDA does not belong on the farm. S. 510 calls for FDA regulation of how
farms grow and harvest produce. Given the agency's track record, it is likely that
the regulations will discriminate against small, organic, and diversified farms.
The House version of the bill directs FDA to consider the impact of its rulemaking
on small-scale and diversified farms, but there are no enforceable limits or protections
for small diversified and organic farms from inappropriate and burdensome federal
rules.
4. Food safety and security both come from a diversified, vibrant local food
system. Local foods give consumers the choice to buy from producers they know,
creating a transparent, accountable food system without federal government oversight.
State and local laws, which are often size-specific rather than one-size-fits-all,
are more appropriate for local food producer.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Act now. We cannot do this without your help.
Sincerely,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
VICFA Communications
Virginia Independent Consumers
and Farmers Association
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
-
[Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510,
John Bischoff, 04/14/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510,
Tradingpost, 04/15/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510,
David Tannen, 04/15/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510, Tradingpost, 04/15/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510, Sue Oberle, 04/15/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510,
David Tannen, 04/15/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510,
Pego Rice, 04/15/2010
- [Livingontheland] Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510, moon, 04/18/2010
-
[Livingontheland] Get on the Phone Now: SB-510,
moon, 04/18/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Get on the Phone Now: SB-510,
Tradingpost, 04/18/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Get on the Phone Now: SB-510,
moon, 04/19/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] Get on the Phone Now: SB-510, Tradingpost, 04/19/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Get on the Phone Now: SB-510,
moon, 04/19/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Get on the Phone Now: SB-510,
Tradingpost, 04/18/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] Fwd: Food Safety and Modernization Act SB-510,
Tradingpost, 04/15/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.