Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] Fw: Re: The Climate Science Isn't Settled Confident predictions of catastrophe are unwarranted.

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Tommy Tolson <healinghawk@earthlink.net>
  • To: Healthy soil and sustainable growing <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Fw: Re: The Climate Science Isn't Settled Confident predictions of catastrophe are unwarranted.
  • Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:09:27 -0600

Title: The Climate Science Isn't Settled   Confident predictions of catastrophe are unwarranted.
Here's a link that rebuts Lindzen.  Climate science is not controversial, among scientists.


Smiles.
Tommy


On Dec 6, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Pete Vukovich wrote:

Today a friend sent me this. Personally I find the issue confusing, I know good objective physicists who have firm beliefs that most of the 'global warming' we've measured isn't due to C02 (they claim the infrared scattering coefficients for C02 in the 15 micron? bands don't give much credence to global warming theories - many believe sun activity is a more likely cause).

The fact is I don't know for myself how much C02 and methane will cause how much warming, like my much of my food I get my client science information second hand. For me it seems obvious enough that oil and gas are limited/slowly replaced resources which shouldn't be squandered. Like so much these days climate change appears to be as much a religious issue for people as a quantitative one. That said I just don't have an educated enough opinion on climate change, my opinion on an over reliance on petrochemical energy hasn't changed in a very long time.

  





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page