Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] "real" farming? was (no subject)

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "TradingPostPaul" <tradingpost@riseup.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] "real" farming? was (no subject)
  • Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:49:46 -0700


So you're nothing but an absentee landlord, and you don't worry with how
it's done long as you get paid for the use of your family's land.

Well, from what you just said, you (as in "we") produce nothing. You're not
in "that group" at all, you don't farm; you couldn't care less if it's
farmed sustainably or not since you don't care to know the bothersome
"details"; you don't know if the poor guy farming for you is even making
enough to live on; you don't know the first thing about how farming is done
today; yet you tell us we don't know what we're talking about.

Case closed.

BTW my father was a teacher, cattleman, farmer, and I grew up on a tractor,
and his father homesteaded in Two Buttes, Colorado in 1920, and then they
lived through the Depression and Dust Bowl in Kansas. Though they never had
money back then, their eight kids never went hungry because they knew how
to garden and keep a root cellar. As for our way of farming in the past, we
all did it wrong and we all paid dearly. I watched cotton farmers go broke
in the 1950s, following the government's advice. I watched farm families go
from several million down to less than one million, and most of those work
a job in town to pay bills. The typical big farmer today gets about a 2%
return on investment (you can do better with a savings account). Something
is dreadfully wrong and we're not going to keep quiet while people who
haven't got a clue and couldn't care less accuse us of not knowing about
"real" farming.

paul tradingpost@lobo.net

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 3/15/2007 at 2:50 PM Barbara Fischer wrote:

>I only know that the topsoil is still there.....good rich BLACK earth. It
>does not blow away. The water table is very high, being only about 50'
>down. Wells bring up good water and it is unending. We have produced
>record yields of over 200 bushels of corn to an acre. We rotate crops
>every
>year between corn and soybeans. Since we have a local farmer who farms it
>I
>cannot give you details. I only know what the results are and have always
>been. I guess I resent being in that group you all want to talk badly
>about. I don't think you have any idea of what real farming is all
abouit.
>I wish you would take me off this list before I say something worse.
>
>Barbara
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "TradingPostPaul" <tradingpost@riseup.net>
>To: <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
>Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 3:35 PM
>Subject: [Livingontheland] "real" farming? was (no subject)
>
>
>>
>> We have no way of guessing what methods your family has used to farm
>since
>> 1860. Why don't you tell us about soil and water conservation practices
>> your family has employed since 1860? What is your soil organic matter
>> content? We can go from there.
>>
>> I assure you we know what soil scientists and right-thinking growers
have
>> known for a very long time, that plowing and cultivating and drenching
>the
>> land with anhydrous ammonia and superphosphate and not repleshishing the
>> organic matter with cover crops and compost has destroyed a large part
of
>> the topsoil and its structure and fertility, and industrial agribusiness
>is
>> robbing the land's production for our children and grandchildren. That
is
>a
>> crime against nature and the future, and we will be held accountable.
>>
>> I suggest you look into the methods of Joel Salatin, a well known
>> fifth-generation farmer who farms sustainably and only sells locally. It
>> would be very awkward to tell him he doesn't know what "real" farming is
>> about.
>>
>> If you really want to insist most of us don't know what we're talking
>> about, then I suggest you answer specific issues about growing methods
>> instead of flaming, which on any list is a mark of inability to reason
>from
>> evidence.
>>
>> paul tradingpost@lobo.net
>>
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>>
>> On 3/15/2007 at 2:14 PM Barbara Fischer wrote:
>>
>> >I am getting just a little bit tired of all the bashing of the previous
>> >farmers. My family has been farming the same farm in central Illinois
>> >since 1860 and we haven't "ruined" it yet. Most of you don't know what
>> >you are talking about. ...being a "little" garden plot farmer does not
>> >make you knowledgeable about real farming. Geezh!
>> >
>> >Barbara
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Gloria Baikauskas
>> > To: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
>> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 11:48 AM
>> > Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] (no subject)
>> >
>> >
>> > From my reading I have read that there was really only the one group
>in
>> >South America that did agriculture right. The Kakopki....can't for the
>> >life of me remember their name....though I know it is something in that
>> >region of the alphabet. I have been forgetting lots of things of late
>> >because of personal stress unfortunately. These were the ones who
>> >planted around trees on mounds. They then left....came back to tend
the
>> >plants and top the trees so they would get sun before harvest.
>> >
>> > The terra preta folks apparently did something right since their soil
>is
>> >still fertile. It was my understanding that they did not slash and
>> >burn....but rather that they buried wood in clay pots in the ground and
>> >covered it after starting it on fire to create charcoal. Something
>about
>> >the mixture made the terra preta. I haven't read the article for a
>> >while...so my memory is a bit fuzzy. I know scientists have tried
>> >repeatedly to reproduce it and have not exactly gotten it right....but
>> >close.
>> >
>> > The Amazon is infertile....but it was planted intentionally in rows.
>It
>> >only sustains the plants that grow within it which have adapted to the
>> >soil and surroundings. It may have at one time been a great farm.
>Dunno.
>> > They are still trying to figure that one out....and ripping it down to
>> >try farming it, ranching it....and failing.
>> >
>> > Yeah.....we did make quite a mess of the land in the US. Twas those
>> >brilliant folks in the 40s and 50s who didn't listen to the leaders in
>> >their field on how to fix the problem....but who instead turned to the
>new
>> >guys with their saving grace chemicals.....with stupid planting ideas
>like
>> >monocropping. Better to go back to the small farms again which did
>> >produce....and to let the small farmers grow hemp again so if the food
>> >crop fails they still have something that won't to pay the bills.
>> >
>> > Gloria, Texas
>> >
>> >
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>> ---
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Livingontheland mailing list
>> > Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
>> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
>> >
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Livingontheland mailing list
>> >Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
>> >http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Livingontheland mailing list
>> Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Livingontheland mailing list
>Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page