internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking
- From: Tony Spencer <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:59:17 +0100
Title: Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking Dave,
My homework for you is to chase down the ‘facts’ in that video. But before you chase those down take a step back and ask yourself how many people would have to be in on this secret for it to work. Wrap your head around the vast number of people that would have to defy human instinct and keep their mouth shut.
On 9/21/06 10:45 PM, "matusiak" <dave AT matusiak.org> wrote:
Tony --
Since we are now revealing our deep-seated and highly passionate man-
love for each other, I must admit that this is why I love you so
much. Every six months, there is another visceral Conservative vs.
Liberal ("Good guy vs. Bad guy" in government-speak) sparring topic,
and every six months you reach a point where you exhaustedly proclaim
that I have "lost all credibility."
But to your good credit, you continue to engage with me in this witty
repartee which we both inherently understand to be nothing more than
a ruse, an illusion if you will, to hide our true feelings from the
shaming eye of the public. I suspect it is not really my credibility
at stake here, but rather the sanctity of mine own heart. Love doth
not play a fair game.
Til next we meet,
david "The Misunderstood Conservative"
On Sep 21, 2006, at 4:34 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
> OMG, tuz I love you but you really just lost all credibility.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, zman, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, matusiak, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, matusiak, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Greg Brown, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, matusiak, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about 9/11, conspiracies, or Freedom, matusiak, 09/22/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about 9/11, conspiracies, or Freedom, burnett, 09/22/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about 9/11, conspiracies, or Freedom, Thomas Beckett, 09/22/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about 9/11, conspiracies, or Freedom, Greg Brown, 09/23/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Thomas Beckett, 09/22/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Tanner Lovelace, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Thomas Beckett, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, uzoma nwosu, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, Jim Ray, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] not about off-line social networking, burnett, 09/21/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.