internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Shea Tisdale" <shea AT sheatisdale.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:08:46 -0500
Chad Ingham wrote:
>
> This has nothing to do with freedom of religion.
Sure it does. When the government is funding religious based education
programs and allowing religious organizations to influence public education
programs such as sex education.
>
>
> For your benefit, perhaps I should clarify that I wasn't talking about
> choosing only the "Republican" or "Democratic" set of values to bring in
> to sex ed teaching. I meant you can choose any set of mixed values and
> someone is going to have an issue with it. And in our political system,
> the values are most like to lean more towards a Republican or Democratic
> platform of values and therefore the other party is going to raise a
> ruckus. Which is what congressman what's-his-name has done.
How about we just teach the facts? Which apparently is not in the agenda of
the Republicans...
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Michael, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Michael, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Evan Zimmerman, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Michael, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Michael, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Thomas Beckett, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
zman, 12/02/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Shea Tisdale, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Shea Tisdale, 12/02/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
zman, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Tanner Lovelace, 12/02/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
zman, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
zman, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
zman, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Sil Greene, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, zman, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
zman, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Tanner Lovelace, 12/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?, Evan Zimmerman, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Chad Ingham, 12/02/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Shea Tisdale, 12/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] why am I not surprised?,
Michael, 12/02/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.