Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] stretching definitions doesn't help

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: David Minton <dminton AT mindspring.com>
  • To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] stretching definitions doesn't help
  • Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:45:50 -0400

On 10/20/04 11:17 AM, "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com> wrote:

>> what he wanted and the reasons given were untrue. A calculated risk?
>
> Perhaps. I don't *know* that Bush didn't lie anymore than anyone else here
> *knows* that he did lie. We could go in circles forever on this.
>
> Here is an interesting article though on the dangers and difficulties of
> politics and intelligence. Sounds like Clinton was convinced Sadaam had
> WMD's as well although I'm sure you guys will explain to me that Bush simply
> infiltrated Tenet before Clinton appointed him. :)
>
> http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2004-01-27-burkee_x.htm
>
> "When Clinton was here recently," Barroso told a Portuguese news service,
> "he told me he was absolutely convinced, given his years in the White House
> and the access to privileged information which he had, that Iraq possessed
> weapons of mass destruction until the end of the Saddam regime."

Can we agree that Bush's assertions on Iraqi WMD's were untrue (different
from a lie)?

David





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page