Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>]

Sil Greene wrote:

> Nader's rationale for taking their money is one thing; the screwy thing 
> here is their rationale for donating it.  Do I sense a new business 
> model here?  Third-party candidate-for-hire?

New to the national political stage maybe, but the idea is older
than dirt.  Join a volunteer organization that elects it's leaders
sometime ( a volunteer fire department can be a great example)
and you'll see every sort of political trickery known to man.

Nominating a candidate for an office for the sole purpose of
draining votes from another contender is a time-honored
tradition in such environments.  Of course, no exchange of
money is usually involved, but that's the logical extension, no?
:-)

TTYL,

Phil
--
Vote Badnarik for President 2004
www.badnarik.org

FREE AMERICA
Vote Libertarian
www.lp.org