Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:28:48 -0400

Sil Greene wrote:

Nader's rationale for taking their money is one thing; the screwy thing here is their rationale for donating it. Do I sense a new business model here? Third-party candidate-for-hire?

New to the national political stage maybe, but the idea is older
than dirt. Join a volunteer organization that elects it's leaders
sometime ( a volunteer fire department can be a great example)
and you'll see every sort of political trickery known to man.

Nominating a candidate for an office for the sole purpose of
draining votes from another contender is a time-honored
tradition in such environments. Of course, no exchange of
money is usually involved, but that's the logical extension, no?
:-)

TTYL,

Phil
--
Vote Badnarik for President 2004
www.badnarik.org

FREE AMERICA
Vote Libertarian
www.lp.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page