internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik
- From: Sil Greene <quack AT ibiblio.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:19:56 -0400 (EDT)
Reported 04.07.22 00:12 from Thomas:
.:Phillip Rhodes wrote:
.:> There's a nice article here, explaining why Democrats
.:> + Kerry / Edwards supporters should support Mike
.:> Badnarik.
.:
.:This is the same reason that Republicans are financing Ralph Nader's
.:campaign. I don't buy Nader's rationale for taking their money. I
.:don't buy this rationale for donating to Badenov^h^h^h^hnarik.
Nader's rationale for taking their money is one thing; the screwy thing
here is their rationale for donating it. Do I sense a new business
model here? Third-party candidate-for-hire?
--s
-
[internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik,
Phillip Rhodes, 07/21/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik, Ilan Volow, 07/21/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik,
Thomas, 07/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik,
Sil Greene, 07/22/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik, Tony Spencer, 07/22/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik, Phillip Rhodes, 07/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support Mike Badnarik,
Sil Greene, 07/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.