Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

["Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>]

> Nader's rationale for taking their money is one thing; the 
> screwy thing here is their rationale for donating it.  Do I 
> sense a new business model here?  Third-party candidate-for-hire?
Remember Perot?

As a big fan of Bush I have to say I'll take Kerry any day over any Green
Party candidate.  They are as anti-small-business as you can get.

T O N Y  S P E N C E R
Notsleepy LLC
6512 Six Forks Rd.
Suite 502-B 
Raleigh, NC 27615
Phone: 919.848.0691
Mobile: 415.637.6481
tony AT tonyspencer.com 

  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org 
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf 
> Of Sil Greene
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 1:20 AM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Why Democrats should support 
> Mike Badnarik
> 
> 
> 
> Reported 04.07.22 00:12 from Thomas:
> .:Phillip Rhodes wrote:
> .:> There's a nice article here, explaining why Democrats .:> 
> + Kerry / Edwards supporters should support Mike .:> Badnarik.
> .:
> .:This is the same reason that Republicans are financing 
> Ralph Nader's .:campaign.  I don't buy Nader's rationale for 
> taking their money.  I .:don't buy this rationale for 
> donating to Badenov^h^h^h^hnarik.
> 
> Nader's rationale for taking their money is one thing; the 
> screwy thing here is their rationale for donating it.  Do I 
> sense a new business model here?  Third-party candidate-for-hire?
> 
> --s
> 
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!  
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list 
> To unsubscribe visit 
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
> 
>