internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Alan MacHett" <machett AT ibiblio.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more)
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:38:47 -0400 (EDT)
In reference to ron thigpen's message:
> if you want to see where the various pollutants in your area are coming
> from, try scorecard.org. here's the summary for my zip (watch wrap):
> <http://www.scorecard.org/community/index.tcl?zip_code=27608 >
>
Holy $#*&!! I looked at Carrboro/Chapel Hill and see that, according to
Scorecard.org, UNC is one helluva polluter (carbon monoxide). Wondering
what those numbers meant, I looked up a few other places; it's all
relative:
Rank
@location Facility City Tons
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 UNC AT CHAPEL HILL CHAPEL HILL 1100
2 MEBANE LUMBER CO MEBANE 49
1 PHILIP MORRIS USA RICHMOND 230
2 VIRGINIA POWER RICHMOND 46
1 ACME STEEL COMPANY [Chicago] 49000
2 KOPPERS INDUSTRIES,INC [Chicago] 16000
-Alan
-
[internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
zman, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
zman, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Jeremy Portzer, 07/15/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), zman, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
ron thigpen, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), ron thigpen, 07/15/2004
- [internetworkers] EPA & Bureauocracy, Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), zman, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Jeremy Portzer, 07/15/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Greg Cox, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
zman, 07/15/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Michael Czeiszperger, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
Shea Tisdale, 07/15/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), ron thigpen, 07/15/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more),
zman, 07/15/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.