internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more)

From: Greg Cox <glcox AT pobox.com>
To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 10:46:24 -0400 (EDT)

> I'm still curious what utilities or factories are polluting NC.

Weyerhauser is big down east. Hog farms. Power plants (Nukulaar ones, too!).

> They just aren't as visible as rush-hour traffic.

Us townfolk in our horseless carriages are just easier to spot. There's
plenty of state out there to pollute, though. I'm doing my part!!1!
Are you????

Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more) , (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), zman, 07/15/2004
  - Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
    - Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), zman, 07/15/2004
      - Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Jeremy Portzer, 07/15/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), zman, 07/15/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), ron thigpen, 07/15/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), ron thigpen, 07/15/2004
        
        [internetworkers] EPA & Bureauocracy, Alan MacHett, 07/15/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), zman, 07/15/2004
    - Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Greg Cox, 07/15/2004
  - Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Michael Czeiszperger, 07/15/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), Shea Tisdale, 07/15/2004
  - Re: [internetworkers] EPA v. NC (and more), ron thigpen, 07/15/2004