internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS
- From: Tanner Lovelace <lovelace AT wayfarer.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:29:01 -0500
Steven Champeon said the following on 3/24/04 1:16 PM:
"4. NETWORK OPERATIONS MAILBOX NAMES
Operations addresses are intended to provide recourse for customers,
providers and others who are experiencing difficulties with the
organization's Internet service.
MAILBOX AREA USAGE
----------- ---------------- ---------------------------
ABUSE Customer Relations Inappropriate public behaviour
NOC Network Operations Network infrastructure
SECURITY Network Security Security bulletins or queries"
Maybe I'll suggest to Derek that he highlight those sections as well.
Steve
So, then, it's not just postmaster and abuse that are required?
Instead, it's postmaster, abuse, noc, and security? It's interesting
how the story changes to suit the purposes of those who are
talking about it...
Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace | Don't move! Or I'll fill ya full of... little
lovelace AT wayfarer.org | yellow bolts of light! - Commander John Crichton
-
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS,
Tarus Balog, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS,
Ian Meyer, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS,
Alexander Wilson, 03/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Steven Champeon, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Tanner Lovelace, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Greg Cox, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Tanner Lovelace, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Steven Champeon, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Tanner Lovelace, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Steven Champeon, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Tanner Lovelace, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Steven Champeon, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Tanner Lovelace, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Steven Champeon, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Tanner Lovelace, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Steven Champeon, 03/24/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Tanner Lovelace, 03/25/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Greg Cox, 03/25/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Jim Ray, 03/25/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, matusiak, 03/25/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS, Sil Greene, 03/25/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS,
Alexander Wilson, 03/23/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS,
Ian Meyer, 03/22/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] contacts or suggestions for dealing with SPEWS,
Tarus Balog, 03/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.