Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
  • To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
  • Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 14:22:31 -0500

wow. ok.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf
> Of Ian Meyer
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:21 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> yeah, its offensive.
>
> ian
> - -------------------------
> What's that file that's attached you ask? Well, its my Gnu
> Privacy Guard (GnuPG) signature that can be used to
> authenticate this email.
> For more information, check out
> http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:14 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
>
> > what? i don't get your point.
> >
> > this campaign button is precisely the same as the bush ads.
> >
> > is this button heinous, disgusting, trampling of victims
> for political
> > gain?
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On
> Behalf Of David
> >> R.Matusiak
> >> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:12 PM
> >> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> >> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
> >>
> >> so, are we back to 1940? should we take away voting rights from
> >> Blacks and women now? is regression the best possible path from
> >> here?
> >>
> >> progress happens. either learn to adapt or get crushed in
> its path.
> >>
> >> On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:00 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
> >>
> >>>> it's an interesting focus. blocking official
> investigations into
> >>>> what the upper levels of the administration knew (or
> didn't know)
> >>>> prior to the attacks?
> >>>
> >>> I feel pretty confident the Roosevelt administration would have
> >>> blocked what was known about Japan two and half years after Pearl
> >>> Harbor.
> >>>
> >>> Speaking of FDR. Is this heinous? Is this cheap political gain?
> >>> <http://wwiimuseum.com/images/TourPictures/08a_Roosevelt-
> >>> plaque_lge.jpg>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> >> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> >> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list To
> >> unsubscribe visit
> >> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---
> > Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> > You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list To
> > unsubscribe visit
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFASNMdDaRr/N2jLBARArzsAKCC2ePmyGFYT36TeaTO3CODto1vnwCfcqfm
> GjzvVQfDc85Fjw1BYnr0p+4=
> =kj6i
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page