internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Tanner Lovelace <lovelace AT wayfarer.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 00:55:18 -0500
Thomas Beckett wrote:
The never-ending redistricting litigation has put the very basis of the elections in to question, so the state Board of Election put off the state primary elections until July. That is far too late for any meaningful participation in the presidential selection process, so the state party is implementing a contingency plan for electing delegates in lieu of the established primary election. You must be a registered Democrat to participate.
So, who do I complain about for the fact that all of us who refuse to
affiliate with a political party are now effectively disenfranchised?
I was planning on voting in the democratic primary (because there
really isn't a republican primary this year) to hopefully influence in
some micro-miniscule way the election but now I just have to accept
what's given to me in the November election?!? What's the point
of having laws that say independents can vote in primaries then?
The question is, who's fault it it? The republicans for the damn
lawsuit or the democrats for moving things around. <sarcasm>Perhaps
I should just sue them all</sarscasm>. Nah, better to vote them
all out of office...
Tanner
-
[internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]
, (continued)
-
[internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres],
James Dasher, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres], Thomas Beckett, 02/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]],
Diana Duncan, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], K. Jo Garner, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Ron Thigpen, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], James Z. Godwin, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Thomas Beckett, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Edward Wesolowski, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Diana Duncan, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], James Dasher, 02/12/2004
-
[internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres],
James Dasher, 02/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Diana Duncan, 02/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Maria Winslow, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, Michael Czeiszperger, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, Diana Duncan, 02/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Edward Wesolowski, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, Thomas Beckett, 02/12/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, Shea Tisdale, 02/13/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Maria Winslow, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, Thomas Beckett, 02/11/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.