internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
[internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]
- From: James Dasher <jdasher AT ibiblio.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:41:01 -0500
On Wednesday, Feb 11, 2004, at 10:42 US/Eastern, Shea Tisdale wrote:
This whole affair is an embarrassment to the state. The state legislature
and the republicans who drew these crazy boundaries should be ashamed.
Republicans didn't invent gerrymandering. They weren't even the first to use the tactic in drawing electoral districts in North Carolina.
The problem stems from limiting the number of Representatives to the U.S. House; and both Senators and Representatives in the General Assembly.
IIRC, the Constitution originally mandated one Representative for every 60,000 people. Today, the number is capped at 435. Thus, each citizen matters less as the population grows. It ain't quite taxation without representation, but it's certainly taxation with less and less representation.
I'm familiar with arguments against removing the limit, and they all boil down to "it wouldn't work". But telling citizens that they're too dumb to figure out how to manage to govern themselves is hardly worthy of a government supposedly of, by, and for those same citizens.
With almost 300,000,000 people in the U.S., we'd have almost 5,000 Representatives. North Carolina, with roughly 8,000,000 people, would have more than 100 Representatives. Socialists, Greens, Libertarians, Conservatives, Reformists, and others would all have a chance to elect someone to represent them.
If you think 5,000 (or more) people can't figure out how to get anything done, then don't take the easy way out. How *could* they get things done (assuming you actually want them to ;) ? Besides, with more Representatives, the legislative branch wouldn't have to cede so much regulatory (i.e. lawmaking) authority to the executive branch The government-as-jobs-program (for rich and middle-class bureaucrats alike) could shift to the legislative branch, where citizens can actually do something about it.
So: smaller government, more effective government, more representative government - what's not to love?
We need a constitutional amendment to lift the ban on representation.
--
James Dasher
misterdasher dot com
IM misterdasher
-
[internetworkers] [Fwd: Bush Supports Shift of Jobs Overseas],
Dan Smith, 02/10/2004
-
[internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Paul Jones, 02/10/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, Phillip Rhodes, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Ian Meyer, 02/10/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, David R . Matusiak, 02/10/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Thomas Beckett, 02/11/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Shea Tisdale, 02/11/2004
-
[internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres],
James Dasher, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres], Thomas Beckett, 02/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]],
Diana Duncan, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], K. Jo Garner, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Ron Thigpen, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], James Z. Godwin, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Thomas Beckett, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Edward Wesolowski, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], Diana Duncan, 02/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Population [was Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres]], James Dasher, 02/12/2004
-
[internetworkers] Representation [was Candidate Match for Pres],
James Dasher, 02/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Shea Tisdale, 02/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres, Tanner Lovelace, 02/12/2004
-
[internetworkers] Candidate Match for Pres,
Paul Jones, 02/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.