Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Tom Caswell <derpimpkar AT yahoo.com>]

You can't go wrong with Simpsons.

 

Tom

Rowland Smith <rowland AT nc.rr.com> wrote:

> All this talk of killing is really making me hungry - anyone up for a 
> monster steak this weekend?
>
> Rowland
>
>
> Alan MacHett wrote:
>
> >James Dasher said:
> > 
> >
> >>Leaving enemy soldiers critically wounded still gives the enemy
> >>latitude to make some last effort that could harm you or your soldiers
> >>- pulling a trigger, throwing a grenade, activating a bomb, or even
> >>speed-dialing on the cell phone to warn others. When that happens,
> >>your soldiers die. The best way to avert such a catastrophe is to
> >>kill, not wound, an enemy.
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >
> >just a short comment on this last point:
> >
> >Standard military theory promotes injuring the enemy. It's even part of
> >US Army Ranger doctrine. Injured soldiers slow the enemy. Every assault
> >soldier
>  (the ones actively engaged in warfare -- infantry, artillery,
> >etc.) requires approximately 10 support personnel; injured soldiers only
> >exascerbate those figures. Injured soldiers have to be carried and cared
> >for by their comrades. Injured soldiers also tend to scream in pain,
> >which has a nice psychological effect on the enemy. Better to nearly kill
> >them than to kill them.
> >
> >--Alan
> >
> >
> >---
> >Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> >You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> >To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
> >
> > 
> >
>
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
>  http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers

---

Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing