Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] the cowards at the Pentagon

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rowland Smith <rowland AT nc.rr.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] the cowards at the Pentagon
  • Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:53:11 -0500

All this talk of killing is really making me hungry - anyone up for a monster steak this weekend?

Rowland


Alan MacHett wrote:

James Dasher said:

Leaving enemy soldiers critically wounded still gives the enemy
latitude to make some last effort that could harm you or your soldiers
- pulling a trigger, throwing a grenade, activating a bomb, or even
speed-dialing on the cell phone to warn others. When that happens,
your soldiers die. The best way to avert such a catastrophe is to
kill, not wound, an enemy.



just a short comment on this last point:

Standard military theory promotes injuring the enemy. It's even part of
US Army Ranger doctrine. Injured soldiers slow the enemy. Every assault
soldier (the ones actively engaged in warfare -- infantry, artillery,
etc.) requires approximately 10 support personnel; injured soldiers only
exascerbate those figures. Injured soldiers have to be carried and cared
for by their comrades. Injured soldiers also tend to scream in pain,
which has a nice psychological effect on the enemy. Better to nearly kill
them than to kill them.

--Alan


---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers








Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page