internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:05:10 -0400
what about if it only accepted mail from a given address?
anyway, thanks for the help with this guys...
as for the sendmail part, anyone know how i configure that kind of stuff on OS X?
thanks a lot
ian
On Oct 14, 2003, at 1:31 PM, Steven Champeon wrote:
on Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 01:25:01PM -0400, Ilan Volow wrote:
On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 11:25 AM, Steven Champeon wrote:
on Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 11:24:02AM -0400, zman wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Steven Champeon wrote:
Wouldn't be hard at all, actually. Completely, insanely,
ridiculously,
insecure, sure. But not hard to do. Via sendmail's aliases file:
and then the SPAM starts going to that address...
Exactly the problem Greg had with metababy.
Couldn't you include some sort of public key thingy that verifies your
identity as an attachment to the e-mail, and make sure on the server
that info from e-mails is posted only if the e-mail has an attachment
that checks out?
Sure, but then you've opened yourself up to DoS attack, as pgp/gpg
churns through signed messages.
--
hesketh.com/inc. v: (919) 834-2552 f: (919) 834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
Book publishing is second only to furniture delivery in slowness. -b. schneier
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Ian Meyer, 10/14/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Kurt Schlatzer, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Ian Meyer, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
zman, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
zman, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Ilan Volow, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Ian Meyer, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: Another take on a new website.., James Manning, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Another take on a new website.., Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
zman, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., zman, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Steven Champeon, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
zman, 10/14/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Ian Meyer, 10/14/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..,
Kurt Schlatzer, 10/14/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website.., Ian Meyer, 10/14/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.