Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Steven Champeon <schampeo AT hesketh.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Another take on a new website..
  • Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 16:23:29 -0400

on Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 04:19:30PM -0400, Michael Winslow Czeiszperger wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 04:10 PM, Steven Champeon wrote:
> >Same way you do anywhere else. But you may want to take a few months
> >to come up to speed on sendmail before you go putting it on the Net;
> >it's one of the most obtuse and cranky pieces of software ever written.
>
> I once interviewed at a minor UNIX vendor, but they wouldn't give me
> any information about the position other than it was on the OS team.
> Sitting in the manager's office I noticed a book on sendmail, and
> during the course of the conversation issued the above opinion. As it
> turned out they job was for someone to maintain sendmail :-)

Heh. Well, that explains why certain minor Unix vendors have had such a
problem with sendmail all these years ;) Me, I just let sendmail.org
maintain it. But I have an, um, substantially modified sendmail.cf now,
after some six months of hacking it up to reject various known spam
signatures. I find it amusing that sendmail rulesets often resemble the
sort of line noise that spammers use to work around filters...

--
hesketh.com/inc. v: (919) 834-2552 f: (919) 834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
Book publishing is second only to furniture delivery in slowness. -b. schneier




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page