Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[David R.Matusiak <dave AT matusiak.org>]

"But I thought we were in the Trust Tree?  Ya know, safe place where we 
can say our feelings?"

   --- Frank The Tank

On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 12:27  PM, Shea Tisdale wrote:

> You are correct.  There is no privacy here.

<and what is up with this alphabet soup below?  have web standards 
fallen this far?>

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-
> > bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of David Minton
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2003 9:43 AM
> > To: InterNetWorkers
> > Subject: Re: New Web Site (was RE: [internetworkers] <mySQL learning
> curve
> > />)
> >
> > On 10/14/03 8:30 AM, "Michael D. Thomas" <mdthomas AT mindspring.com>
> wrote:
> > > * Permissions: The original author -- who ever does the post -- must
> > > agree that their content can be published (The other way to think
> about
> > > it is to consider that any content posted to the list somehow
> becomes
> > > the property of INW. I don't think we want to go there.) One of the
> > > trickier problems is where one author replies to another. Do you
> have to
> > > get permissions from both?
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > * The permission scheme is very, very important! There are two ways
> to
> > > think about permissions: opt-in and opt-out. I think that the author
> has
> > > to opt-in on a per post/article basis. Beyond that you can have
> > > convenience mechanisms -- "I'll just opt-in for all posts so I don't
> > > have to opt-in on a per article basis."
> >
> > I thought all posts were archived on the site already? The archive
> gets
> > spidered, so no one should have any impression that anything posted to
> the
> > list is private.
> >
> > David