Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Edward Wesolowski <edwes AT idisplay.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?
  • Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:45:08 -0400

Shea:
...just curious, what's your source on this:
"And this doesn't even include the number of ballets that are simply lost. In NC in the past
few years, thousands of votes have simply been lost."

Definitely looks right, but I was wondering, is this from the newspapers
or....
Ed Wesolowski


At 11:51 PM 9/19/03 -0400, you wrote:
The Electoral College argument is a weak one at best. In the past 200
years there have only been two, arguably three, occasions where they
differed from the popular vote and in those cases it was always a
situation where the popular vote was very, very close.

And if you going to nit pick to that extent, then you should be more
concerned with unelected and unaccountable local officials rendering
decisions on votes that can't be machine read properly. Each election
more than 10 times the number of votes in question in Bush v Gore are
discarded because local officials decide they are incorrect in some way.
In most cases the ballet is wholesale discarded even though it is
perhaps only a single mark that is incorrect. And this doesn't even
include the number of ballets that are simply lost. In NC in the past
few years, thousands of votes have simply been lost.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-
> bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of zman
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:04 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?
>
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Rebecca O'Connell wrote:
> > But the idea behind a representative democracy is that we elect
> > representatives and they act on our behalf. "We" hired "them" (or
hired
> the
> > people who hired "them") and if "we" donĀ¹t approve of what "they" do
> then we
>
> I believe we still use the Electorial College, which in my opinion
only
> takes the popular vote as a suggestion. I would tend to agree with you
if
> you could take them out of the equation.
>
> --
> Scott H. Zekanis
> zman AT kungfumonkey.com
> http://www.rod-o-rama.com
> http://www.thehellbenders.com
> 1957 Buick Riviera Hardtop (2 dr., 364" Nailhead)
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers


---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page