internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Edward Wesolowski <edwes AT idisplay.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?
- Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:52:00 -0400
Thanks
The articles are referencing the CalTech/MIT study "Voting: What Is, What Could Be."
The comments on viability of "Direct Recording Electronic" machines are interesting. ...this is on computerized and on Internet voting systems. ...security issues, expense, but the authors say snags w/electronic voting are likely to be worked out, and it's what's coming.
Best
Ed Wesolowski
At 09:33 AM 9/22/03 -0400, you wrote:
http://www.lwv.org/elibrary/nv/2002/voter_0302_4.html
Currently, during the average U.S. presidential election, between four
and six million votes, out of the approximately 100 million cast, are
"lost" or go uncounted due to faulty or outdated voting machinery and
registration problems, according to a study by scientists and engineers
from the California Institute of Technology and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology.
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/nr/2003/vote.html
About 120,000 votes were lost in Massachusetts statewide elections in
2000 due to election practices and technologies that could be reformed,
according to a Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project report written by
Charles Stewart, professor of political science at MIT, and funded by
The Boston Foundation.
The estimate of lost votes is based on Census Bureau research, which
reported that almost 10 percent of 1.3 million registered Massachusetts
voters who did not cast ballots that year cited registration problems
at the precinct as their reason. The MIT report, "Voting in
Massachusetts" (pdf file), states that these lost votes could be
recovered by adopting a range of sweeping and incremental reforms.
http://www.brennancenter.org/presscenter/pressrelease_2003_0730.html
LAWSUIT CHARGES CITY BOARD OF ELECTIONS KNOWINGLY FAILED TO REPAIR
VOTING MACHINES
60,000 New York City voters thwarted in 2000 election; Similar numbers
of lost votes in other recent elections; Minorities disproportionately
harmed
A lawsuit filed today in federal court claims that some 60,000 residents
of New York City failed to have their votes counted in the 2000
elections because the City Board of Elections left disabled a voting
machine device designed to prevent such undervoting. The device, known
as a sensor latch, had been disabled in all 7,000 New York City lever
voting machines. The suit filed in the Eastern District of New York on
behalf of the Working Families Party, ACORN and individual voters by the
Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law seeks to compel the
Board of Elections to repair the sensor latches in the Citys voting
machines.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-
> bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Edward Wesolowski
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:45 AM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?
>
> Shea:
> ...just curious, what's your source on this:
> "And this doesn't even include the number of ballets that are simply
> lost. In NC in the past
> few years, thousands of votes have simply been lost."
>
> Definitely looks right, but I was wondering, is this from the
newspapers
> or....
> Ed Wesolowski
>
>
> At 11:51 PM 9/19/03 -0400, you wrote:
> >The Electoral College argument is a weak one at best. In the past
200
> >years there have only been two, arguably three, occasions where they
> >differed from the popular vote and in those cases it was always a
> >situation where the popular vote was very, very close.
> >
> >And if you going to nit pick to that extent, then you should be more
> >concerned with unelected and unaccountable local officials rendering
> >decisions on votes that can't be machine read properly. Each
election
> >more than 10 times the number of votes in question in Bush v Gore are
> >discarded because local officials decide they are incorrect in some
way.
> >In most cases the ballet is wholesale discarded even though it is
> >perhaps only a single mark that is incorrect. And this doesn't even
> >include the number of ballets that are simply lost. In NC in the
past
> >few years, thousands of votes have simply been lost.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >[mailto:internetworkers-
> > > bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of zman
> > > Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 6:04 PM
> > > To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> > > Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?
> > >
> > > On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Rebecca O'Connell wrote:
> > > > But the idea behind a representative democracy is that we elect
> > > > representatives and they act on our behalf. "We" hired "them"
(or
> >hired
> > > the
> > > > people who hired "them") and if "we" don¹t approve of what
"they" do
> > > then we
> > >
> > > I believe we still use the Electorial College, which in my opinion
> >only
> > > takes the popular vote as a suggestion. I would tend to agree with
you
> >if
> > > you could take them out of the equation.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Scott H. Zekanis
> > > zman AT kungfumonkey.com
> > > http://www.rod-o-rama.com
> > > http://www.thehellbenders.com
> > > 1957 Buick Riviera Hardtop (2 dr., 364" Nailhead)
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> > > http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> > > You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> > > To unsubscribe visit
> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
> >
> >
> >---
> >Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web
> >site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> >You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> >To unsubscribe visit
> >http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?, K. Jo Garner, 09/19/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Shea Tisdale, 09/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?, K. Jo Garner, 09/19/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?, Shea Tisdale, 09/19/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
zman, 09/19/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Shea Tisdale, 09/19/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Thomas Beckett, 09/20/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?, Roger Austin, 09/20/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Edward Wesolowski, 09/22/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Shea Tisdale, 09/22/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?, Edward Wesolowski, 09/22/2003
- [internetworkers] Nitpicking the Nitwit (was: "Bush the monster?"), David R . Matusiak, 09/22/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] Nitpicking the Nitwit (was: "Bush the monster?"), Shea Tisdale, 09/22/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Shea Tisdale, 09/22/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Thomas Beckett, 09/20/2003
- [internetworkers] new cause for Sally Struthers, was Bush the Monster, Scott Lundgren, 09/22/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] Bush the monster?,
Shea Tisdale, 09/19/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.