internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Scott Lundgren" <s_l AT mindspring.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] anti-spam
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:05:47 -0400
>Laws need to be put into place. And to make it worse, to make them
>work you'll need to have some form of tracking, which will intrude and
>make email require identification to get, etc.
Laws suck and are ridiculously behind technology (as they should be for new
laws should be crafted with research and wisdom).
I'm want to see how much push will pick up to re-write SMTP.
- SL
-
[internetworkers] anti-spam,
machett, 06/06/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Tom Boucher, 06/06/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Scott Lundgren, 06/07/2003
- [internetworkers] RE: anti-spam, Lance A. Brown, 06/07/2003
- [internetworkers] Hexapod Swimming Robot, Victor Minton, 06/12/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Scott Lundgren, 06/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Jay Cuthrell, 06/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Drew Adams, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Tom Boucher, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Victor Minton, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
zman, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
David Minton, 06/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam, Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 06/09/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam, Beckett, 06/09/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
David Minton, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
zman, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Victor Minton, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Tom Boucher, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Drew Adams, 06/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] anti-spam,
Tom Boucher, 06/06/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.