Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Kevin - The Alchemist - Sonney <alchemist AT darkcanvas.com>]

On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:01:08PM -0400, Austin, Roger D. spoke thusly:
>  As I understand the situation, they say that W2k Pro has bugs, but they are
> satisfied with using W95 "in the meantime"? Logic anyone? W2k is a quantum
> leap up in stability compared with DOS/W95. It must be something specific in
> the relationship with other software packages or something to do with active
> directory setup.

And it's default setup is insecure (read: code red II cripled some
companies because they set up default Win2K with IIS installed)

Well, that and you have to pay to upgrade to 98 or NT, then pay
*AGAIN* for a new licenese for 2K. So it costs roughly double to do an
intermediary upgrade now.

As I understand M$ pricing. *grin*

-- 
--------------------------------------------
--      Kevin "The Alchemist" Sonney      --
--  New email : alchemist AT darkcanvas.com  --
--  http://www.darkcanvas.com/~alchemist  --
--  ICQ: 4855069            AIM: ksonney  --
--------------------------------------------

"If you'll read the subtext for many of those old strips, you'll find
the heart of an old-fashioned Libertarian. And I'd be a Libertarian,
if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners."
  -- Berkley Breathed, 2001