Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: Microsoft (blah blah) + SHOES

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Austin, Roger D." <rda AT rti.org>
  • To: 'InterNetWorkers' <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: Microsoft (blah blah) + SHOES
  • Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:01:08 -0400


As I understand the situation, they say that W2k Pro has bugs, but they are
satisfied with using W95 "in the meantime"? Logic anyone? W2k is a quantum
leap up in stability compared with DOS/W95. It must be something specific in
the relationship with other software packages or something to do with active
directory setup.
Just wondering out loud. Roger (in RTP)

-----Original Message-----
From: Gina Norman [mailto:gina AT vnet.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:56 PM
To: InterNetWorkers
Subject: [internetworkers] Re: Microsoft (blah blah) + SHOES

We're definitely switching to Win 2K; however, the rollout was delayed due
to bugs.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page